HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Geophysics geology errors
37
Nov 17, 2007 01:22PM
1
PM
Nov 17, 2007 01:51PM
2
Nov 17, 2007 04:12PM

Points noted, but there are rumours of problems with the 200m data, possibly making the 2003 Fugro airborne magnetic and EM survey at 300m line spacings more reliable. The latter does put a substantial portion of the anomaly on FNC's adjoining claim. It is the data that I base my speculation on.

http://www.ccnmatthews.com/docs/FNC1...

Bear in mind that the northern boundary of FNC's claim is actaully 150 to 200m south of where it shown on this map, as admitted by Peter Smith. That 150-200m in question would be on NOT's claim.

Regards,

B.

6
Nov 17, 2007 04:44PM
13
Nov 17, 2007 04:44PM
4
Nov 17, 2007 04:52PM
5
Nov 17, 2007 05:08PM
1
Nov 17, 2007 05:14PM

Nov 17, 2007 05:49PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply