denotes parts of the page that are editable
YouTube Small-Cap Podcast iTunes
AGORACOM TV IS NOW ON DEMAND!
AGORACOM TV Is Available Anytime and Anywhere. Now, You Never Have To Miss It If Life Gets Too Busy @ 9:45 AM EST.
Watch Repeats on YouTube, Subscribe To Our RSS Feed On Our Very Own SmallCapPodcast Or Automatically Download OnTo Your iPod Via iTunes.
For Our Web 2.0 Super-Users, You Can Even Pick Up The Show By Following Us On Twitter.
If You Believe As We Do That We Are Entering The Buying Opportunity Of A Lifetime, Don't Miss An Episode Of AGORACOM TV !
If I'M reading page 10 correctly, the examiner references the 148 claim 'occupying a majority of said singe substrate (See Fig 33, whereby memory arrays MARYO-MARY# occupy the majority of the total area of the substrate.)'
I can not find it anywhere where it states what the examiner is saying which is underlined above. Anybody, please correct me if I'm wrong and it does say that somewhere. If not then -
The 4956811 prior art rejection is based, not on any words, but on the scale provided in Fig 33 diagram? Yikes! If this is the case, then the examiner is going out of his way to insure this is rejected. Does anyone have access to Fig 33? Wonder if there is any descriptive notes that address this issue or just the diagram in Fig 33? Opty
1 member recommends this.
Like Patriot Scientific? Then you might also be interested in Pro Travel Network
