So you are suggesting that the insider trading restrictions where in place because of of the settlement of litigation, with zero or very few dollars attached, that had already been announced to the world on 18 Dec?
Your agrument makes no sense to me. BTW, it wasn't covered by an NDA, but a (comparable perhaps) Confidentiality Clause in the settlement agreement which obviously only covered the terms of the settlement, not the settlement itself. Now, per what was revealed in the 10Q and the Letter, we supposedly got everything we're going to get from the Js. So are you suggesting there's more to come?, that isn't yet revealed but is known to insiders? Then why the lifting of trading reestrictions?
Now this to consider: if "that's it and there ain't no more", and the trading restrictions of course covered buying and selling, with selling being the right move per what we've learned from the 10Q and Letter, why did RG buy? GF buy? PTSC reinstitute buying?
Our current situation defies logic on so many levels..... That is unless my "Current Attitude" series was right on the mark, and there's more to come from the Js and others contingent on USPTO.
BTW, IMO an ongoing royalty scheme is not in play. If it were, and there were definite dollars to come regardless of whether they are determinable, this would have to be revealed in the 10Q.
JMHO,
SGE
1 member recommends this.
