Understood DevPts. Again, I'm all for the questions and answers, keeping on track of the drilling/progress as much as possible. And asking for clarity where needed. I was just additionally pointing out that we are going to have to take some of this on faith, to the best judgment of the LBSU team.
It seems possible to me that LBSU might be drilling at one pipe, leave it to work another for a while, then re-assess the prior pipe and decide to drill a bit more there. And if that happened, I wouldn't want someone to think "Wait, I thought they said they were done with that pipe, what's going on?". LBSU will likely need the flexibility to move back and forth, depending on what they find, or even if they decide one approach is not working and they want to try another, etc. Which might make the reports look confusing or even deceptive, when in fact it could just be a very flexible "work in progress" approach to exploring the pipes for uranium. Good luck to us all on this.